Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Bitcoin Advertising Facebook Slashdot.org

Meta Allows More Cryptocurrency Ads (engadget.com) 32

Meta is backing away from its longstanding (if not absolute) ban on cryptocurrency ads. Engadget reports: As CNBC reports, Meta has greatly loosened its ban by expanding the number of regulatory licenses it accepts from three to 27. The crypto landscape has "matured and stabilized" enough to justify the change of heart, the company said, including an increased amount of government regulation that sets "clearer responsibilities and expectations."

Advertisers still need written permission to run ads for cryptocurrency exchanges, lending and borrowing, crypto mining tools and wallets that let you buy, sell, stake or swap tokens. This does, however, open the door to cryptocurrency businesses that previously couldn't run any ads, not to mention would-be investors who might not be familiar with the market.
The report goes on to note that "the shift comes just a day after Meta's crypto overseer, David Marcus, said he was leaving the company."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Meta Allows More Cryptocurrency Ads

Comments Filter:
  • by Sarusa ( 104047 ) on Wednesday December 01, 2021 @09:16PM (#62038125)

    They're Facebook, aka metastatic cancer. Why play along with their PR schemes by letting them change their name to avoid even some of the well deserved hate associated with 15 years of deliberate Facebook evil?

    In the interests of journalism you could add 'Facebook has changed it's name to Meta' somewhere in the article, but otherwise call a turd a turd.

    • It reflects them more accurately.

    • Because we are a branding economy and re-branding is just another aspect of the whole process? If news companies tried to highlight this issue, it would hurt their bottom line. Reporting and news is hugely a brand, one that especially in America has become hugely political. If I say Fox News, you instantly get an idea of the "type of people" representing the Brand and the sentiments of the establishment. When individuals push an inconvenient story or truth, they will be canned in a heartbeat.

      Most people pro

    • They're Facebook, aka metastatic cancer. Why play along with their PR schemes by letting them change their name to avoid even some of the well deserved hate associated with 15 years of deliberate Facebook evil?

      In the interests of journalism you could add 'Facebook has changed it's name to Meta' somewhere in the article, but otherwise call a turd a turd.

      I prefer "I don't know what Meta is, sounds stupid, don't want to know." and I'm sticking with it. Maybe all memory of any crappy instance of facebook can then fade... probably not that lucky.

  • by fredrated ( 639554 ) on Wednesday December 01, 2021 @09:42PM (#62038159) Journal

    I suggest because "profit".

  • Title fix (Score:4, Interesting)

    by NoMoreDupes ( 8410441 ) on Wednesday December 01, 2021 @10:03PM (#62038183)

    Meta Allows More Scam Ads

    There ftfy

    • by leonbev ( 111395 )

      Yeah, I can't wait to see all of the wonderful scam tokens that get advertised on Facebook over the next few months. Most of them will probably rival the Squid Game token in overall investment quality.

  • by Mean Variance ( 913229 ) <mean.variance@gmail.com> on Wednesday December 01, 2021 @10:37PM (#62038223)

    As an example, crypto.com just bought the sponsorship of the Staples Center (LA Lakers and Clippers home). They are recently all over the Formula 1 circuit, both cars and tracks. I'm sure elsewhere (probably soccer since they splay ads right on their jerseys).

    MLB umps have FTX patches on their shirts. I've seen Tezos, a minor crypto on a Formula 1 car.

    I'm sure Facebook would like to have a taste of that money being thrown around.

  • huh Facebok had limits in this area? The number of blatant scam ads saying Bill Gates or Elon Musk etc just bought X of crypto Y or invested in this crypto app and they don't want you to know are astounding and when you report them they are ignored as legitimate ads. If outright scams are permitted surely everything is aopen
    • A Facebook restriction is like Willy Wanka (The Gene Wilder version ) trying to stop a kid from doing something that could harm them or others.

      "no, please stop"

  • ...is still cancer regardless of the name.

  • The cancer is metastasizing at an ever increasing rate.
  • by MpVpRb ( 1423381 ) on Thursday December 02, 2021 @11:34AM (#62039935)

    It seems that most of the ads I see on fb are scams. When I report them, the robot classifies me as "engaged" and sends me more of them
    They all follow the same formula....
    Scrape the video from a legitimate site.
    Offer the product at pennies on the dollar.
    Harvest a few bucks from the suckers.
    Disappear without a trace

    Example: There is a laser rust removal tool that sells for over $10K. The scammers use video from the real site and offer it for $29.99 if you order today

  • by TJHook3r ( 4699685 ) on Thursday December 02, 2021 @01:16PM (#62040395)
    Imagine if you could mine crypto by the length of time your car engine idles, and the biggest miners were causing a scarcity of cars because they were buying them all up and leaving them idling all day in car parks that they rented for the purpose.
  • by Maelwryth ( 982896 ) on Thursday December 02, 2021 @02:06PM (#62040633) Homepage Journal
    Facebook can control by having a lot of the money or Facebook can control by being the money. Imagine how bad things would be if government was unable to control Facebook in any way because the effect on the economy would be catastrophic.

Some people manage by the book, even though they don't know who wrote the book or even what book.

Working...