A New Benefit For Logged-In Readers: Meet Slashdot's ROT13 Initiative 261
We appreciate all the support we've gotten over the years from Slashdot's logged-in users. They take part actively in discussions, and in exchange for their active interest in the site, we like to give a few perks over and above what our beloved anonymous readers get. But we never want to deprive anonymous readers of the actual features of the site — whether you're a logged-in account holder, anonymous, a subscriber, or have a username but are browsing anonymously at any given moment, Slashdot has always been freely available to read for anyone with a browser and an uncensored Internet connection. It's a balance we try to maintain, too, Sure, we'd like you to login, and we think it has some worthwhile benefits (like tracking comment responses, building karma, and using the Zoo system to keep track of your friends and foes), but we'll never force you to. Today, we're building on this approach, by introducing a feature that benefits every logged-in user, but still leaves the page free to read for all. We'll be phasing in over the next few days a button that logged-in users and subscribers can click to decrypt the text of each Slashdot posting with the trivial transform known as Rot13. Read more, below!
Don't panic. You don't have to do anything at all, especially for right now. For the rest of the week at least, though, you'll notice that stories are rendered a bit harder to read, because they've been ROT13'd. "Encrypted" seems too strong a word for it, since ROT13 is about as tough an encryption as Pig Latin is, and more consistent. You'll just need to click once more to read the full, plaintext version of each story. After we complete a few shakedown days, subscribers and other logged-in users will always be able to get through to the plaintext just that simply, and for anonymous readers, it'll be nearly as easy: they'll just need to click one button, and watch one painless interstitial ad, to reach each story's plaintext. For the masses who read anonymously but don't want to suffer through any more ads? (Believe us, we understand.) Not to worry! As we transition away from offering the plaintext along with the ROT13 version, there will be several great options for translating ROT13 text; you'll just need to copy and paste the text, or in some cases the URL for the story you'd like to read, into the engine of your choice. We favor the spartan rot13.com, but there are others. Heck, if you're a CS grad, or even an amateur programmer at all, you've probably written a ROT13 translation program, or you can pipe the text through a built-in function in the language of your choice. (Let us know your favorite translation system in the comments below.) If you have any questions about the transition, please let us know.
Note: You'll notice that comments are still in plaintext for now by default. They will probably stay this way for a while, too, even for anonymous readers. The conversion process itself for the 19.2 million comments in our database is pretty trivial, actually, but there have been some glitches with the way that the transform handles things like code inside of comments, and it would be a shame to break any of that code. And it's a near certainty that only anonymous readers will ever see reader comments encrypted with ROT13, when all those details are worked out.
svefg cbfg (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:3)
Second post (Score:3, Funny)
The joke is on Slashdot, I for one have been using ROT26 for several years already.
Re: (Score:3)
I prefer ROT104, myself. It disorients the text more than ROT26, making it easier to handle.
Warning! Security hole in ROT-13 and ROT-26! (Score:5, Insightful)
Cryptography experts have proven long ago that ROT-13 is weak against simple brute-force attack. But it turns out that there is also a little-known security hole in ROT-26, which allows a sophisticated eavesdropper to read the message WITHOUT EVEN KNOWING THE PASSWORD.
Cryptography experts suggest, for robust security, the use of at least ROT-39 encoding should be encouraged. This takes a minimum number of log_2[2^39] tries to decode by brute force.
Some experts have suggested that ROT-39 shares the same security hole as ROT-13, but I don't believe I've seen that result confirmed in peer-reviewed literature.
Re:Warning! Security hole in ROT-13 and ROT-26! (Score:5, Funny)
Wow, I had never heard about the security hole in ROT-26.
Personally, I think I'll skip ROT-39 and go straight to the state-of-the-art ROT-52, if for no other reason because the attackers are still trying to break ROT-39!
Re: (Score:3)
Wow, I had never heard about the security hole in ROT-26.
It's not a bug, it's a feature!
Simpler solution (Score:2)
You can preserve the existing encryption engine by simply using more rounds. The 2-round version has been broken, so cryptographers recommend using the full 16 rounds, as is done in other encryption systems.
Re:Second post (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Second post (Score:4, Funny)
oh timothy... (Score:5, Funny)
The only person in the world that is so bad that his NORMAL writing looks like Rot13...
He's in trouble now... (Score:3)
Don't panic. You don't have to do anything at all
The Adams family's lawyers are sending the takedown notice now... also, reading a slashdot story is now a felony, since the content is cryptographically protected by slashdot's patented Rot-13 DRM technology.
Gotta love them lawyers!
Re: (Score:2)
The Adams family's lawyers are sending the takedown notice now... also, reading a slashdot story is now a felony, since the content is cryptographically protected by slashdot's patented Rot-13 DRM technology.
What do Gomez and Morticia have to do with it?
In the menatime...
or fher gb qevax lbhe binygvar!
Re: (Score:2)
Gomez and Morticia spelled their's with two Ds. (Addams). Maybe he refers to those of the John Q. line?
Not sure if april fools'... (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Not sure if april fools'... (Score:5, Funny)
Did you figure that out all by yourself or did somebody help you?
79, 194, 38, 1701, 89, 76, 11, 83, 1629, 48, 94, 6 (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I think it's brilliant parody. Reminds me of a typical news website from the turn of the century. (This century, not the last one.) First, it was free. Then, it was free but "for your convenience" you had to create an account to participate. Later, it was paywalled "for your additional enjoyment". Extra points for saying "the paywall is so we don't have to put ads on the page" and then later, they put ads up anyway.
Wow (Score:5, Insightful)
Lame. This is pretty lame even by Slashdot standards.
Re:Wow (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Luckily you posted here to save everybody else from the cleverness of the joke.
comedy by committee = non-comedy (Score:5, Insightful)
.
Where's the pink pages? Where's the OMG ponies? Where's the cuteness of fvcking with the CSS and some actual intelligence behind an April Fool's day joke?
:>(
. It's kind of like letting the pointy-haired bosses write a comedy script by committee, zat's what you get with the new
Re: (Score:2)
April Fools on Slashdot is always lame because it's overdone and *every* story is part of it. There's real news today and it's just going to be ignored (Bitcoin just made $100 for example). It's a shame because if Slashdot raised its aim just a little, it could be back to its old glory. Instead, it is happy to ride the inertia into the ground.
Re:Wow (Score:5, Insightful)
What? You were expecting ponies?
Re: (Score:3)
What? You were expecting ponies?
Nobody expected the ponies.
Re: (Score:3)
Lame. This is pretty lame even by Slashdot standards.
Not as lame as posting here just to let everybody how you weren't fooled by it (like, duh!)
(and not posting in ROT13 makes your post double-lame...)
Re: (Score:2)
The comments on this 'article' are far funnier than the "explanation of our April Fool's joke" summary. Ohgawd.
Just going to come right out and say it... (Score:5, Funny)
...someone at slashdot has lost their mind.
Re: (Score:2)
um.
April 1st.
ok, IHBT. I think.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Your hypothesis erroneously presumes that minds were initially present.
Re: (Score:2)
lbh zhfg oe arj urer
Re: (Score:2)
...someone at slashdot has lost their mind.
-1 redundant
$10,000 Challenge (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
No, but it would be a violation of the DMCA.
I Got a Better Idea (Score:5, Interesting)
How about letting logged in users filter out all april fools jokes?
Re:I Got a Better Idea (Score:4)
How about letting logged in users filter out all april fools jokes?
'Jokes' implies funny. This is just lame trolling.
Re: (Score:3)
That would give a blank page. Cause Slashdot is that unfunny guy who thinks he's funny and does a joke to death.
Re: (Score:2)
More BS (Score:5, Insightful)
More April 1 bullshit. Can't they at least come up with one thing that is actually funny?
Or just rename it April 1 troll day and be done with it.
Re: (Score:2)
Their best one was OMG PONIES, but they can't do that one ironically anymore because people actually like ponies now.
Re: (Score:2)
Their best one was OMG PONIES, but they can't do that one ironically anymore because people actually like ponies now.
Not in Tehran they don't.
http://bronies.meetup.com/members/ir/tehran/ [meetup.com]
Granted they probably have to meet in secret if they don't want to end up with their heads on pikes in the name of most merciful Allah.
Re: (Score:2)
funny, cute, or just makes you think. (Score:2)
I don't care. I look forward to it each April 1st. I certainly don't begrudge them not being funny to all people. April 1st is like National Nerd Day.
Its fun to be a geek, humor is what you make of it, my suggestion, take a step back and enjoy the day.
Re: (Score:3)
Oh man, I always hated April fools day on slashdot, because all frontpage articles would be "jokes". It became even worse when slashdot started lagging all the other aggregators in speed. So, today they found a way to even top that with this stupid rot13 shit.
Is today the day slashdot jumped the shark? Probably not, because i see that this article only got around 160 comments. That used to be different five or ten years ago.
Slashdot is dead. The founders knew when to leave, but it is a pity the current owne
Even better! (Score:3, Funny)
this was funny 10 years ago (Score:2, Insightful)
Now the April Fool's jokes on /. are just tired and worn out. There are days why I wonder why I still come here. I guess old habits die hard. Can we not do this shit next year guys?
Re: this was funny 10 years ago (Score:2)
There are two inviolable traditions on Slashdot: April Fools' articles, and incessant whining about them.
Re: (Score:2)
...and incessant whining about them.
Represented in a Venn diagram, everything and whining would be two entirely overlapping circles. This is the way of our people.
Oehpr Fpuarvre snpg (Score:4, Insightful)
Vs lbh nfxrq Oehpr Fpuarvre gb qrpelcg guvf, ur'q pehfu lbhe fxhyy jvgu uvf ynhtu.
Re: (Score:3)
Vs lbh nfxrq Oehpr Fpuarvre gb qrpelcg guvf, ur'q pehfu lbhe fxhyy jvgu uvf ynhtu.
I, for one, use ROT26 to protect my comments. Everybody knows that it offers the level of security that slashdot really needs.
Re: (Score:2)
Nyfb, V pna xvyy lbh jvgu zl oenva.
This is great! (Score:2)
I appreciate this extra security since the Cisco "type 7" encryption was broken earlier this year.
And as a long-time Usenet reader, I can basically de-crypt ROT13 in my sleep.
Re: (Score:2)
Yes and I think this will put slashdot back at the forefront of securely readable (well, after some conversion) news sites.
Although soon we will see an arms race between bookmarklets [wikipedia.org] for decoding and increasingly complex encoding schemes. XOR $ff, anyone?
What I'd really like to see... (Score:3, Funny)
... is 'super members' of the community that have proven their knowledge, there is too much bullshit getting modded insightful when it is outright incorrect. I'd like to see slashdot select logged in moderators get the ability to mark false insightful posts as 'false/incorrect' and turn that posters post a different color.
The amount of disinformation from either youth, the uninformed, trolls, or paid hacks to disrupt intelligent discussion on the internet is something I've grown increasingly weary of. It seems increasingly difficult to have intelligent discussions online. There are people who DO KNOW and understand the world at a higher level then most posters on slashdot and these people could help guide discussions when these forces of stupid / distortion appear.
http://consciouslifenews.com/paid-internet-shill-shadowy-groups-manipulate-internet-opinion-debate/1147073/ [consciouslifenews.com]
Re: (Score:2)
It's called "meta-moderating", and we already have it. I presume from your rant that you make use of this frequently?
Re: (Score:2)
Meta-moderating isn't enough since it is unreliable, especially dealing with youth cohorts (i.e. teens have more free time then adults). You see this especially on politically based posts. Meta-moderating relies on whoever has the energy/time to meta-moderate. There is no guarantee informed people exist in sufficient enough numbers to counter the uninformed because of simple laws of the universe - i.e. the more complex and nuanced you need to be to judge something, the rarer you are in a given population
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
How about people with super high karma can give an "expert point" every other day to posts with essential insights about certain topics. People can then weight posts from people based on the number of points they have received. Maybe choose experts in their field at the beginning to meta-moderate the assigned points.
My favorite day of the year (Score:2)
I love reading the impotent rage in the comments. Keep whining; the April 1st articles will just keep rolling in.
Re: (Score:2)
And the advertising revenue will just keep rolling out...
If I was a CS grad.. (Score:2)
If I was a CS grad.. I'd make an app that blocks Slashdot for me each April 1st....
Yes I'm getting old.
Amazing (Score:2)
btwrst (Score:2)
H cmd n btwrst pr l mñn tmrpn crc d m cs.
Bring it on!!!! (Score:5, Funny)
As said last time... (Score:2)
http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2064678&cid=35688196 [slashdot.org]
Jul fhpu n cbbe pubvpr bs rapelcgvba? (Score:2)
Jul jnf fhpu n cbbe rapelcgvba nytbevguz pubfra? Rirelbar xabjf gevcyr-ebg13 vf orggre.
oh thank fuck for that! (Score:2)
I thought I'd forgotten how to read!
Bastards.
I wnat my theme back! (Score:2)
Way to piss off your customers (Score:2)
This is a good day (Score:2)
to avoid Slashdot.
(rot13-region (region-beginning) (region-end)) (Score:2)
Emacs. Can your editor do that?
(Sorry, couldn't resist.)
FREE DOWNLOAD Slashdot Decoder (Score:2)
Slashdot really doesn't know how to monetize their assets. If they had any common sense the "decoder" would require a "free download" and bundle spyware/adware/malware/shitware.
-insert SEO blogspam here-
See you tomorrow, folks! (Score:2)
This sucks (Score:2)
I hope ... (Score:2)
Bookmarklet decrypter (Score:2)
I use bookmarklets [squarefree.com] to handle rot-13 encoding when I find it. Highlight, click bookmark, read as plain text. Simple.
Enjoy!
RSS broken (Score:5, Insightful)
Great, so now my RSS feed is going to be broken for the rest of the day? I like April Fools' as much as the next guy, but not when it effectively breaks the whole site for the day.
Re:RSS broken (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
ponies! (Score:2)
Why isn't the logo changed? (Score:3)
Ugh (Score:2)
Congratulations! (Score:2)
Hohagh cnpxntr "ofqtnzrf" (Score:2)
this might actually be useful for a day if it (Score:3)
This might actually be useful for a day if it encouraged people to
create accounts but why am I still seeing rot13 after I log in?
I don't mind logging in but I don't like to have to click on every
article to read the summary even after I do log in.
Re:date (Score:5, Insightful)
Wait, what day is it?
April troll's day. I miss the long dead tradition of April fools day.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:3)
Where it would be quicker to write a perl script to do ROT13 translation, than to read the editors' description of what the site did with it.
Assuming it's not an April 1 joke, and it might be (an unusually ponderous one at that).
I can't resist an excuse to do this in tr.
tr 'a-z' 'n-za-m' HERE
Put your message here
HERE
Trivial I know. I'll bet half to slashdot could not resist immediately coding ROT-13 in their favorite language.
Re: (Score:2)
tr 'a-z' 'n-za-m' HERE
And slashdot mashes up the double less thans.
Re: (Score:2)
Where it would be quicker to write a perl script to do ROT13 translation, than to read the editors' description of what the site did with it.
Assuming it's not an April 1 joke, and it might be (an unusually ponderous one at that).
You have a problem: Rot13 translation. You write a perl script. Now you have two problems.
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Seems like a perfect candidate for a simple one-line APL ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/APL_(programming_language) [wikipedia.org] ) function. This should be something like {/~{\}, but my keyboard doesn't have the required keys to enter any of the characters needed. Can anyone help?
Ok, I've managed to work out a truly marvelous 7-character conversion in APL, but the margin is too small to contain it.
Re: (Score:2)
Doesn't matter, /. doesn't support Unicode.
Bravo, you just ruined next year's April fools joke.
"A new benefit for readers: Unicode support in comments. MÃtley Crüe impressed!"
Re: (Score:2)
if you run firefox then you can use leetkey to do all sorts of fun things with/to your text
Re: (Score:2)
I hate Anonymous Coward on Slashdot...
What used to be some witty humor and unusual perspectives has become noise and spamming and just posting too fast everywhere.
Re: (Score:2)
Triple-rot13 FTW!
Re: (Score:3)
Yup. Same here. I think there's a bunch of retards running this site now.