Introducing Slashdot's New Build Section 34
Along with the rest of the mix that makes this site work, Slashdot has nearly two decades now of spotting and showing off interesting projects, inventions, technologies, and hobbies. Some of them are strictly personal, some are frankly commercial, and some are the fruits of ambitious organizations (or tiny teams) motivated by curiosity and passion (or even politics, or just plain fun). As outlined earlier, we've been gathering a lot of these into our new Build section; read on to learn a bit more about what that includes. (And watch out later today for the first part of our conversation with technology-inspiring Rennaisance Man Tim O'Reilly, and later in the week for answers to the questions you asked Bunnie Huang.)
The Build section puts under one big virtual roof makerspace visits, interviews with technologists and innovators, and hands-on projects and inventions. Not everything you'll find in the Build section can be built with a soldering iron and some duct tape (worthy projects can come from a large company, a university or a DARPA competition just as well as from a personal workshop, and different resources mean different constraints and possibilities), but all of it should be inspirational: it's a big umbrella, and it can include projects that incorporate biotech, new materials, creative use of sensors, 3-D printing, hardware built to be hackable, cooking, robots, and re-purposing equipment that without a dose of practical creativity might be consigned to a junk-heap, but don't have to be.Just like the rest of Slashdot, the Build section combines reader-suggested, editor-curated stories with original content, like video visits to the hackerspaces and makerspaces where some of these projects and technologies emerge, and interviews with some of the people behind the (happily booming) culture of invention. Most of the stories that appear in the Build section will also appear on the main section of the site, but reading the Build section itself means getting a concentrated dose of cool endeavors, as well as some section-exclusive posts. Expect the occasional small give-away, and most importantly send along your tips and suggestions for projects you'd like to see explored here.
What inspires you, inspires Slashdot.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Well ... only about 1 percent of the site's lifespan so far, by back-of-envelope figures ;)
But you're right -- we've been playing with it a while. Nifty new graphic (if you see the beta version of it), too. More changes and section-specific stuff eventually, too, but it's much readier to explore, now that we've added in a lot of the older stories that make sense in this section.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
God you're an idiot Timothy. I've watched your fucking drivel for years and you're by far the worst "editor" Slashdot has ever had.
So, how do you really feel?
I love how people rant about the mindless, idiotic comments on sites like YouTube, but then it's totally ok to attach someone personally here on Slashdot, because We're Tech Geeks. We're Better Than Everyone Else©®
Re:"new" (Score:4)
Thanks for the clarification Timothy. I appreciate your work at /. - warts and all!
A great filter (Score:2, Insightful)
Does this mean we can finally stop flooding the front page with 3D printing, new uses for the Raspberry Pi, and Bitcoin?
Re: (Score:1)
Why the fuck do you think if you don't want it, nobody wants it? Who voted you king of /. posters?
Dick.
Re:Do not want (Score:4, Funny)
SILENCE! I have spoken!
We commenters could freshen CSS, keep functions in (Score:5, Interesting)
It occurs to me that we on Slashdot are a knowledgeable crowd. I was thinking about how many person-hours we've spent on saying "fuck beta". In a small fraction of that time, maybe five minutes each, we could suggest some CSS tweaks that would freshen the look (what Dice marketing department wants) without getting in the way of functionality (what we oldtimers want).
Re:We commenters could freshen CSS, keep functions (Score:5, Insightful)
Obviously Dice Marketing doesn't understand the /. market. We old timers are not impressed by spacious, trendy design, we are impressed by concise content.
Or maybe they're trying to run the old timers off so they can full tilt ruin /. and the remaining n00bs will think it's awesome.
Re: (Score:2)
Front post on Slashdot right now about how Fark is doing the same thing.
Re:We commenters could freshen CSS, keep functions (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
It's gotten a lot better... all in all, it is just a blockier version of what we've got now, which I like.
It is still missing a couple of killer features in the comments area, the big one being the one-line display of comments that are above 0 but not above 2. This little thing is really essential to follow the conversation while only reading the good stuff. As soon as beta has it, I'll move; as long as they don't, I won't.
Comment removed (Score:4, Interesting)
That would be interesting. I'd include APK remover (Score:3)
User-uploaded CSS would be interesting. I bet I could figure out a way to do the following in pure CSS. Right now it's a user.js file. // ==UserScript== // @name NoAPK // @namespace http://yoursite.com/ [yoursite.com] // @include * // @version 1 // ==/UserScript==
It sets display: none on any posts by APK so I don't have to scroll past his spam on my phone.
if(window.location.hostname.indexOf("slashdot.org") > -1)
{
var xpath = '//li[contains(concat(" ", normalize-space(@class
Must be one of your posts I can't see (Score:2)
Whatever you're talking about must be one of your posts removed by my filter.
I'm adding a few words from this post to my filter, so I won't be able to see any replies you might make.
Have a great day, spamming piece of shit.
Re: (Score:2)
This is a fantastic idea.
Re:We commenters could freshen CSS, keep functions (Score:5, Insightful)
A couple of days ago Soylent News implemented Unicode support. Considering the far greater resources that Dice have and how few Soylent needed to get it done, you would think real features like that would be coming thick and fast. Instead they wasted all the effort on a cosmetic make-over that most people seem to hate and which isn't even functionally as good as the classic site.
Unfortunately I think Slashdot's problems go far deeper than can be fixed with a bit of CSS.
Re: (Score:2)
"A couple of days ago Soylent News implemented Unicode support."
Have they implemented thicker skin, yet?
Also, Unicode was slated for release like end of month one. It took them this long to implement?
Looks like shit simply can't get done in a timely fashion, on either side.
Great! (Score:2)
Now someone could build a usable beta page and we can finally get rid of the turd!
C'mon, /., even MS eventually got the hint about Metro...
Re: (Score:2)
What happened with Metro? Last I heard/saw it was still kicking (legit question, I don't really follow what's going on in Windows anymore).
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Windowed metro apps are coming, this is widely regarded as MS admitting that no one wants to use full screen metro apps when they can use a traditional desktop gui.
Re: (Score:2)
Ah, awesome.
Weird (Score:1)
A bunch of whiners (Score:5, Interesting)
also a place for software hacks/projects? (Score:2)
a Slashdot/Hackaday type site for programming nuggets? [slashdot.org]
(that didn't get to the front page though)
Will this section only be for hardware hacks or are hobby software projects covered too?