Slashdot Mobile: Now For Tablets As Well As Phones 123
Gaurav Kuchhal (Head of
Product, Slashdot) writes "Slashdot Mobile has finally made it out of the gates for tablets as well as phones. The Mobile site for phones launched some weeks back, but now you can take advantage of the changes we've made to read Slashdot easier to read through touch-screen devices on tablets as well as phones. That includes features we've folded in to the mobile version from the desktop-browser view of the site, so you can scan user profiles, sip from the Firehose, and keep up with notifications. See this blog post for more details, and keep the feedback coming. If you see a problem, please tell us about it!"
Nice work (Score:1)
FP> Glad to see you's guys finally going mobile. Keep up the good work!
any chance of getting those in the reg. version? (Score:5, Insightful)
Some of those features seem pretty useful, especially notification of replies. Will they be added to the regular, non-mobile/tablet version of the website as well?
Re: (Score:3)
Some of those features seem pretty useful, especially notification of replies. Will they be added to the regular, non-mobile/tablet version of the website as well?
It's already there and has been for quite a long time. Go turn it on in your settings.
Re: (Score:1)
Here's your answer (Score:2)
They were in negotiations about being acquired [theverge.com] by Dice.
Question (Score:2, Interesting)
Serious question. Why did you create a separate web site rather than just use a different stylesheet with the "handheld" css media type?
Re:Question (Score:5, Informative)
Serious question. Why did you create a separate web site rather than just use a different stylesheet with the "handheld" css media type?
because they're realistic? name one complex forum type of site for which the different stylesheet approach works?
this saves memory on the handheld sites - or at least makes it simpler for deciding which javascript to load to make the site function(and in which way).
or at least should.
(mobile browsers have different quirks and so forth.. and it's good if you can have the option of deciding which to go to. also some tablets run desktop os's and browsers..)
Re: (Score:2)
on a second note, it would be nice if the mobile site reacted to click events.
Re: (Score:1)
In the future, if you're coming from a mobile device, we'll show you the mobile version. BUT you'll always be able to switch to the full site if you prefer.
One of the upcoming features is being able to set your comment browsing level. The comment slider doesn't work too well for mobile so it needs some thought.
looks good after.... (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I found this pretty stupid. Instead of listing supported devices manually, make a standards compliant tablet-oriented website, and if it fails for some non-compliant browser, blame it.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Read a story you'd like to contribute your voice to? I hope you're logged in, because if you're logged out you may not be able to find the story again once you log in.
I think you just described Reddit, and perhaps most other forum sites too...
Re: (Score:2)
So why not just log in under a new tab? Your browser session will then transfer over to the other tab. Or am I missing something?
Re: (Score:2)
Slashdot is by far the most difficult website to read and comment on.
You need to go look at the Gawker Media sites. Those are designed by retorted baboons with a penchant for pain.
Re: (Score:1)
Does not work without javascript (Score:1)
Nice design.. but does not work wihout javascript enabled.
Re: (Score:2)
Why enable it if it isn't necessary? Slashdot is a nerd site so cater to the needs of nerds.
Re: (Score:2)
Nerds don't need JavaScript because more often than not it's used for dumb, shiny and annoying features and ads which together just slow down the loading and viewing of the website.
Unfortunately, there's an increasing number of websites where basic features like search don't even work anymore without JavaScript. Graceful degradation seems to be a thing from the past.
Re: (Score:2)
Weirdly there's a growing number of web sites that don't work on a teletype any more, too.
Re: (Score:2)
You don't get it, do you? Graceful degradation is part of the WWW's design. Using broken HTML and using JavaScript to add the functionality that was left out is ridiculous. It's like crippling functionality that used to work and then applying a weird patch.
Re: (Score:2)
Yes, i do get it. I'm pretty sure i've never made a web site that wouldn't work with JavaScript turned off. But that doesn't mean i can't joke about it.
Re: (Score:1)
I didn't get that it was a joke. My apologies.
Re: (Score:1)
JavaScript was designed to be a tool for some extra interactivity on websites. You're abusing it and making it mandatory. If you still think it's about harmful JavaScript or web browsers without JavaScript support, you must be blind. It's about accessibility. Do you even read the posts you reply to?
Tablet is HIGHER resolution than many laptops (Score:1)
My tablet has higher resolution than many laptops sold today, so I'm not interested in a different layout.
Regardless, I'd like to choose whether the mobile or normal layout is shown.
Re:Tablet is HIGHER resolution than many laptops (Score:5, Insightful)
Exactly this. I don't EVER want to see a mobile version of any website on my tablet. And yet far too many websites refuse to give me the full site no matter what I click, ignoring the flag in my browser for "request desktop version" and not having anything of their own I can click to get there.
I have never seen a site that works better on my tablet in mobile version than full, but I have seen many sites refuse to let me even try the full version.
Additionally, my phone is now in the same range, I only want the desktop version on it too. again, not an option on many sites.
Re: (Score:2)
Yes, yes, yes.
And even on my phone which is *not* in that range, no mobile site I've ever seen works well. There is always too much loss of funtionality. I'm willing to scroll around on the desktop site, even if I'm doing so through a tiny porthole. If you're going to force your mobile site on me, then I'll just leave. Give me a way to turn the damned thing off.
To be fair, Slashdot hasn't forced it on us yet. When I go to http://slashdot.org/ [slashdot.org] on my phone, I get the real site, not the mobile one. Lets h
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
The only major problems I'm aware of with the full version of Slashdot on mobile devices are the ratings slider (which could be trivially fixed by adding support for touch events or by providing an alternative set of up-down arrow controls for the two values that appear only on mobile devices via CSS trickery) and the fact that the minimum column width is too damn wide for viewing on a phone, so you end up scrolling back and forth (which again could be trivially fixed with CSS by adding the various -*-text-
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Amen to that.
I can't tell you how annoying it is to follow a link that says "redirecting to our mobile site", which then dumps you at the main page without attempting to get you where you wanted and no way to get to it.
If you can't give me the content I was looking for, and give me at least as good as what I'd have gotten from the normal pag
Re: (Score:1)
Oh, yes, I'm so tired of that. ..and the mbeta site is weirdly proportioned on my galaxy tab. Looks like I'm getting the "ancient nokia" version stretched to fill a 10 inch screen. Just gimme the desktop site already.
Good work! (Score:5, Interesting)
Sincerely. Even though I still use this system [pixelcity.com] that I banged together a few years ago (more info here [pixelcity.com]), the new mbeta page looks really nice.
Missing important feature (Score:5, Funny)
How come there is no tiles? Give us tiles!
Re: (Score:2)
Tiles? Tiles!? No! You will read Slashdot in full ASCII glory [wikipedia.org], and you will like it, or randomly die. Actually, you'll randomly die anyway, but you'll still like it. Or else...something.
Re: (Score:2)
Or else you'll be eaten by a grue.
slow and clumsy (Score:5, Insightful)
I just tried on my htc desire with cianogene mod. It is much slower than the "original" version. I need to click a link to read the summary, which completely defeat the purpose of having a homepage. If I want to click the stories I want to read, i'd use an RSS feed reader not slashdot home page.
I won't use it.
Does not work on Windows Phone (Score:1)
Re:Does not work on N900 (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Geez, there was an article about that not that long ago
http://developers.slashdot.org/story/12/11/18/1421204/microsoft-complains-that-webkit-breaks-web-standards [slashdot.org]
Re: (Score:2)
Free isn't as important open.
Re: (Score:2)
For some people. Not everybody is as politically interested in libre software -- no matter what the great bearded one thinks.
For many people, free is all they care about.
Re: (Score:2)
Don't work in my Nokia N9, and Meego is one the closest things you have right now of a full mobile linux experience. Not tried in the N900, but in that case would be even worse.
So no, is not anti-Windows phone bias, don't attribute to malice what can be adequately explained by stupidity.
tiny useless summaries (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:tiny useless summaries (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Good experience (Score:1)
Make the back button work (Score:2)
Bad placement (Score:2)
Select Comment Score Threshold (Score:3)
I like the new mobile site it is very clean, but the biggest problem I have is you can't select your comment score threshold. I like to browse from 2 to 4 depending on the number of comments I get back, but the "Top Rated" link doesn't give me as good of control over what I want to see at the time and quite often I'll get 1's in there.
My only other issue is that it is *very* touchy and sometimes trying to grab the screen to scroll gets interpreted as a tap and it loads up the article.
Other than that, great job guys!
Please (Score:1)
scroll lag. (Score:1)
a mobile site should support "mobile devices"... (Score:1)
Basically non-functional on either my phone or the Android Tablet I am current developing on:
Android 2.3 & 4.0 w/ current Opera for Android.
This is a rough crowd--would be nice if a "Mobile Site" would work with a pair of pretty vanilla "Mobile Devices".
Maybe Slashdot needs a QA department?
I hope that does not mean (Score:2)
Ummm (Score:2)
Does it load a different interface dependent on device! Or doesn't look the same across all? If so, it's a very very iOS looking design, at leas the top menus. Just strange for a site that Rae's against Apple so much...
Thank you. Feeling like 1999 again (Score:1)
Already got the spam ... (Score:3)
Already got the email from Slashdot ... and getting email from Slashdot is kinda new, especially since it's coming from a 3rd party (elabs10.com).
And I'm not sure I especially like a Slashdot which emails me such things through a mass-mail host. Especially one which has apparently been blacklisted as a spammer. I'm pretty sure I never told Slashdot they could do that.
Maybe "Dice Holdings" are becoming asshats?
Ugh. (Score:2)
Why would you post this today? Sometime last week you updated the mobile code and broke scrolling. Seriously. On the Android 4 browser you can now basically no longer properly scroll the mbeta.slashdot.org site. It's like it's eating touch and/or scroll events for lunch. You clearly tried to fix this, because you can now fling again, but if you are in contact with the touchscreen, the site stops scrolling within a second or so. This problem was not present a week or two ago. Very, horrifically annoyi
Blank page (Score:2)
Going to mbeta.slashdot.org on my Nokia N900 results in a blank page. The regular site works well when browsing with Midori and Firefox. What am I missing here?
Re: (Score:2)
Blank for me on my iPhone as well. And can't click anything but the ads when I try to load this in Chrome. Doesn't seem to be beta quality yet.
Nothing different on my iPad (Score:2)
nothing different on iPad compared to the regular site... except, the OBNOXIOUS pop-up banner ad thing at the bottom.
Seriously? Thanks for that.
Re: (Score:2)
hate to reply to self, but just found out that you have to click the mbeta link to see it on iPad... I assumed it would pick up the agent and redirect since the summary says "launched."
I probably don't understand what "launched" means, though.
Device not supported (Score:2)
Please add blackberry playbook to the devices that are supported. It's the same webkit browser everyone else is using (though with better compliance scores in many cases), and it works just fine when I click 'let me in anyway'.
One minor issue... (Score:2)
There really is no need to replace the perfectly functional "back" button on mobile Safari with your own version that takes up 20% of the screen.
Re: (Score:2)
... and doesn't always work.
Why doesn't it look like Slashdot? (Score:3)
Scroll gets interpreted as a click (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Why? (Score:2)
I haven no trouble with the main site on my tablet, so you must be pandering to those people who bought sub standard tablets with low resolution screens who think that all tablets are the 'same'. /sarcasm
Finally (Score:1)
Why not create a dedicated Site App (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
slashdot can barely make a functioning AJAX and CSS for desktop PCs (and it's still slow and css breaks in some browsers)... you want them to make an iOS app that works in different resolutions for iphone5, iphone 4, ipad 1/2/mini, ipad 3/4, and then an Android app that works for the umpteen hordes of different Android versions and devices, and a third one for Windows 8 RT and Windows Surface Pro, and Windows Phone 8, all without sucking balls?
You ask too much.
Yay... WAP all over again (Score:2)
Great. Another web site dumbing down the internet.
Please make it optional. My iOS client can view regular web site just fine thank you. And I can zoom into it as required.
Geez.
Might as well go back to the WAP days...
Not designed for Phablets? (Score:2)
Posting from Nexus 7 and here is what it looks like in portrait mode. Basically more than half the screen stays empty. What tablets did you test it with, besides iPad?
Screenshot [imgur.com]
Re: (Score:2)
> What tablets did you test it with, besides iPad?
A: None.
PS: We didn't test on the iPad, either. :D
Obligatory... (Score:2)
Really good work (Score:1)
Pace of change is exhausting (Score:2)
First I used the normal slashdot from my PC.
Then I wanted to be cool and modern and shit like everyone else so I upgraded my AMPS brick phone to one of those new models with a retardedly high resolution...
Now whenever I go to a site that dares give me a paired down mobile version automatically without asking it makes me sad..sometimes I even want to frown.
Occasionally it is nice to just sit fads out and wait for technology to go full circle instead of wasting time caring about useless short term problems li
Firefox + Phony does the trick (Score:2)
On my Nexus 7 tablet, I *never* want the mobile version of a Web site. Best solution to this is to use Firefox and the Phony extension (set to be the desktop Firefox agent string) and your surfing will be exactly like your desktop browsing is.
rss (Score:2)
I browse topics through Google reader on my phone and on my pc. Is there a way for the site to detect the browser and launch the right version? I dint want to have to have two feeds for the same site.
Thanks.... (Score:1)
WebOS (Score:2)
It doesn't detect my Palm Pre or Touchpad properly. Those both use the same webkit rendering engine as everyone else. Looks great, though! Please add WebOS to your detection.
Re: (Score:2)
Also, what will the actual URL be? Don't really want to bookmark mbeta and then not know about things going live.
Re: (Score:3)
Ah well, Slashdot has never been known for being state-of-the-art.
God, I wish it would stop trying. Plain old HTML works on every device.