> okay, we've got it — it's not ready. We have work to do on four big areas: > feature parity (especially for commenting); the overall UI, especially in terms of information density and headline scanning; > plain old bugs; and, lastly, the need for a better framework for communicating about the How and the Why of this process.
Let's pretend for a moment that the folks making the decisions aren't so dense that they can't hear what everyone is telling them Let's pretend they don't want to
by Anonymous Coward writes:
on Monday February 10, 2014 @11:17AM (#46209875)
. We can come up with better, more specific feedback than "omg it sucks!", can't we?
It's not like the community hasn't been alternately frothing at the mouth and proffering advice that in another setting probably costs about $250/hr... Personally, I'm close to giving up on/. altogether - I don't even care enough anymore to try and retrieve my password and post this under my usual account.
"omg it sucks!"? Come on, we're more articulate (Score:5, Interesting)
TFS says:
> okay, we've got it — it's not ready. We have work to do on four big areas:
> feature parity (especially for commenting); the overall UI, especially in terms of information density and headline scanning;
> plain old bugs; and, lastly, the need for a better framework for communicating about the How and the Why of this process.
Let's pretend for a moment that the folks making the decisions aren't so dense that they can't hear what everyone is telling them
Let's pretend they don't want to
Re:"omg it sucks!"? Come on, we're more articulate (Score:0)
. We can come up with better, more specific feedback than "omg it sucks!", can't we?
It's not like the community hasn't been alternately frothing at the mouth and proffering advice that in another setting probably costs about $250/hr... /. altogether - I don't even care enough anymore to try and retrieve my password and post this under my usual account.
Personally, I'm close to giving up on