This is fun, I guess. I've seen other posts on this blog as well. It's all moderately interesting, but with the best ones filtered to the top by a human, doesn't that kind of defeat the purpose? Seems like wasted research dollars, to me.
by Anonymous Coward writes:
on Monday October 23, 2017 @03:46AM (#55416283)
Slashdot Media can excise the last trappings of their crappy editorbase and the level of gibberish in headlines and article synopsis' will look no different! Be sure to email Slashdot Media's parent company and voice your approval for their elimination!:)
Likely it's the "curly quote"... which only brings up more questions. Did this user type their response into Word and copy-paste it into slashdot? Before you say "Nobody would ever do that"..... walk a few years in my life. Observe others... The doc says so long as I stop asking "Why?" the anyurisms will likely stay away.
Meh (Score:5, Interesting)
This is fun, I guess. I've seen other posts on this blog as well.
It's all moderately interesting, but with the best ones filtered to the top by a human, doesn't that kind of defeat the purpose?
Seems like wasted research dollars, to me.
It *IS* fun! Finally... (Score:0)
Slashdot Media can excise the last trappings of their crappy editorbase and the level of gibberish in headlines and article synopsis' will look no different! Be sure to email Slashdot Media's parent company and voice your approval for their elimination! :)
captcha was 'adroit' :)
Re: (Score:3)
What are those screwy 'â' things for? Are you trying to be edgy?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
LOL if you thought the problem was the handling of ASCII then you should have just given up, seen his 4 digits, and stayed off the lawn.